Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

New Medicine route required...

  • 23-06-2011 07:45PM
    #1
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭


    Ok so I'm one of those students who was absolutely delighted to hear about the HPAT when it was first introduced. I mean it gave me, and many like me, a much better chance of being able to study Medicine (a dream I've had since early second year).

    Before the introduction of the HPAT, Medical students were expected to achieve a mammoth 600 Leaving Certificate points which was, let’s face it, out of the reach of many people who would make wonderful, caring and diligent Doctors. Those who managed to achieve 600 points were, for the most part, incapable of communicating with their patients because they were out of the comfort zone of their books. The HPAT was set to change all that by allowing students to be deemed eligible for Medicine provided they achieved a much more attainable 480 LC points and take the HPAT (out of 300).

    It therefore baffles me when a student who receives 530 LC points STILL cannot gain entry despite being FIFTY points over the requirement. I thought the idea of the HPAT was to give everyone a fighting chance by subjecting them to the aptitude test yet last summer, many of the high-profiled GP's, Consultants, etc... who are fine Doctors in their own right could not even obtain 150 out of the 300 points. Just because they have done poorly in the HPAT does not mean that they are any less intelligent or any less capable to fulfil their duties as Surgeons/Doctors so I cannot understand why the same cannot be said for us?

    The system is clearly flawed and it is my belief, and I'm sure many more whose dreams of studying Medicine have been impeded by the HPAT, that the selection process for Medical applicants needs another shake-up. Perhaps it should start from as early as 5th year. Students should be given the opportunity to study the subjects which would best aid them in their future careers.

    E.g. for Medicine, students would study English, Maths, Biology, Chemistry and maybe a little Physics.

    Obviously the Garda vetting and Medical clearance facilities would have to remain in effect but maybe an interview process could come into play. It is tried and tested but the best way to understand what one's motives are for something is an interview. They could understand from a conversation who could handle the stresses of a life of Medicine as well as who would have a good bedside manner. If they are well rounded academically (say get over 480 in the LC) they should be allowed to progress to Medical school provided they meet entry requirements (say HB1 in Bio, Chem...).

    I heard the other day that there are not enough Junior Doctors in Ireland and we are currently attempting to bring some over from foreign countries. However if more places were allocated to each Medical institution, there would not be a shortage of Junior Doctors and instead of giving our jobs away we could give them to our fellow Irish men and women, so many of whom are currently unemployed or doing a course in which they have no interest.

    Like so many others, I will once again be waiting for the results of the HPAT (due out this Monday) in the dim hope that I will have done significantly better than last year. If not, I will be forced to return to my boring Chemistry course and try again next year. All we can do is hope at this point.

    What are your guys' opinions on this?
    P.S. Thanks for reading. I appreciate it's long :)


«1

Comments

  • #2
    LittleMissLost
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭LittleMissLost


    I think the HPAT is a load of ****.

    People spend hundreds and hundreds of euro doing preparation courses for it and are bound to do better than the person going in after only looking at the sample booklet.

    Another major flaw and a money making opportunity IMO.


  • #3
    Sunny!!
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,413 ✭✭✭Sunny!!


    i totally agree, i wish it was even the old way where you have to get the 600 even it be a better chance than i have now. Hpat isnt my thing.


  • #4
    cabbage kid
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 146 ✭✭cabbage kid


    I'd really like to see a HPAT. Where can I get a copy of one?


  • #5
    LittleMissLost
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭LittleMissLost


    http://www.hpat-ireland.acer.edu.au/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=69:information-booklet&catid=12:practice-test

    But it's €27.50. money, money money... :rolleyes:


  • #6
    2Scoops
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭2Scoops


    The LC with HPAT is a superior selection process than LC alone, since I would have serious doubts about people who cannot do well in the HPAT. And it's far too easy to get 500+ points in the LC these days - not a good discriminator anymore.

    I wonder if you'd still be against it if you were very likely to get in to a med course? I suspect not. The fact is, it's one of the very easiest ways into medicine in the English-speaking world and it's a transparent, merit-based system. Interviews have no discriminatory value and would heavily bias towards people with inside connections, which would be many in a medical community as small as Ireland's.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    cabbage kid
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 146 ✭✭cabbage kid


    LittleMissLost wrote: »
    http://www.hpat-ireland.acer.edu.au/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=69:information-booklet&catid=12:practice-test

    But it's €27.50. money, money money... :rolleyes:

    I don't want to see one that badly :pac:


  • #8
    LittleMissLost
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭LittleMissLost


    cabbage kid wrote: »
    I don't want to see one that badly :pac:

    lol you can have mine if you want? Think it's under my bed :L


  • #9
    cabbage kid
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 146 ✭✭cabbage kid


    LittleMissLost wrote: »
    lol you can have mine if you want? Think it's under my bed :L

    Haha sound :)


  • #10
    electrictrad
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 367 ✭✭electrictrad


    . . .I'm glad the HPAT is in at the moment. . .and I'm a student well capable of getting the points required. . .if this test really does test suitability to study medecine, and I fail it, then obviously medecine is not the course for me. . .

    One of the teachers ran a course in our school preparing us for the HPAT exam. . .she photocopied the q's from the booklet, and told us about the underlying concepts behind interpersonal understanding skills, and what kind of person they were trying to identify from the tests. . .they're looking for logical, rational thinkers, who are good with people, and able to see things from other people's point of views. . .honestly, I believe that the people who get a place in medecine based on this test are the best doctors of the future. . .if I'm not one of them, so be it. . .


  • #11
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭Dr. Ring


    electrictrad wrote: »
    . . .I'm glad the HPAT is in at the moment. . .and I'm a student well capable of getting the points required. . .if this test really does test suitability to study medecine, and I fail it, then obviously medecine is not the course for me. . .

    One of the teachers ran a course in our school preparing us for the HPAT exam. . .she photocopied the q's from the booklet, and told us about the underlying concepts behind interpersonal understanding skills, and what kind of person they were trying to identify from the tests. . .they're looking for logical, rational thinkers, who are good with people, and able to see things from other people's point of views. . .honestly, I believe that the people who get a place in medecine based on this test are the best doctors of the future. . .if I'm not one of them, so be it. . .

    Yeah I can see where you're coming from. And I agree with stuff you've said. But how can you rationalise that people who do poorly on the HPAT are not suited to the Medical profession when highly-ranked Doctors in our own country did poorly on the HPAT exam from February 2010? Doing badly in no way reflected their abilities as Doctors yet if we do badly we are deemed unsuitable? Do you see my point?


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    LittleMissLost
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭LittleMissLost


    electrictrad wrote: »
    . . .I'm glad the HPAT is in at the moment. . .and I'm a student well capable of getting the points required. . .if this test really does test suitability to study medecine, and I fail it, then obviously medecine is not the course for me. . .

    One of the teachers ran a course in our school preparing us for the HPAT exam. . .she photocopied the q's from the booklet, and told us about the underlying concepts behind interpersonal understanding skills, and what kind of person they were trying to identify from the tests. . .they're looking for logical, rational thinkers, who are good with people, and able to see things from other people's point of views. . .honestly, I believe that the people who get a place in medecine based on this test are the best doctors of the future. . .if I'm not one of them, so be it. . .

    Well don't you have kind and considerate teachers? Bet she passed her TPAT with flying colours ><,

    I must commend the HPAT people for giving out the results before the CAO closes! I shall most likely be taking medicine off my CAO :)


  • #13
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭Dr. Ring


    2Scoops wrote: »
    The LC with HPAT is a superior selection process than LC alone, since I would have serious doubts about people who cannot do well in the HPAT. And it's far too easy to get 500+ points in the LC these days - not a good discriminator anymore.

    I wonder if you'd still be against it if you were very likely to get in to a med course? I suspect not. The fact is, it's one of the very easiest ways into medicine in the English-speaking world and it's a transparent, merit-based system. Interviews have no discriminatory value and would heavily bias towards people with inside connections, which would be many in a medical community as small as Ireland's.

    I also agree with your point that interviews can be comprimised by "allies on the inside". I was merely suggesting an alternative selection process. I just feel that the HPAT is not working as well as it could have. Those who get 600 LC Points (560) and spend hundreds of euro on practise methods (prep courses and past papers) are more likely to gain entry than someone who has surpassed the expected benchmark of 480 and done a moderately-good HPAT exam.

    I agree it is somewhat easier to achieve higher in the Leaving Cert than in history but just as the world has evolved, so too has our educational system. The exams have been changed so that those who work hard in school are rewarded and thos who dont sink to the bottom of the pile. People who achieve over 500 points have obviously worked hard to get their results and should not be overlooked as a possible candidate for Medicine just because the HPAT sc**wed them up. Do you know what I mean?


  • #14
    electrictrad
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 367 ✭✭electrictrad


    LittleMissLost wrote: »
    Well don't you have kind and considerate teachers? Bet she passed her TPAT with flying colours ><,

    I must commend the HPAT people for giving out the results before the CAO closes! I shall most likely be taking medicine off my CAO :)

    We did pay a little bit. . .but less than the price of the booklets. . .:D

    I agree with you. . .but twould be awful if you were restricting your CAO choices for an exam you did months before the CAO deadline closed. . .they have to be given out really. . .


  • #15
    2Scoops
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭2Scoops


    Dr. Ring wrote: »
    But how can you rationalise that people who do poorly on the HPAT are not suited to the Medical profession when highly-ranked Doctors in our own country did poorly on the HPAT exam from February 2010? Doing badly in no way reflected their abilities as Doctors yet if we do badly we are deemed unsuitable? Do you see my point?

    If you're referring the IMJ study of a few months ago, I should point out that highly-ranked doctors did not do poorly on the HPAT in this study - they performed similar to junior doctors and medical students. So, maybe it's true that HPAT is testing a consistent factor associated with medical careers..?

    The study is actually quite poor. More here:
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=69824772


  • #16
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭Dr. Ring


    LittleMissLost wrote: »
    Well don't you have kind and considerate teachers? Bet she passed her TPAT with flying colours ><,

    Another good point. There are a lot of professions that could also be tested for one's "Suitability". Teachers for example: You could be the greatest psychopath in the world yet all you have to do to get to children is do an arts course, your HDIP and an interview or a similar route for primary teaching. We could all do well in an Arts course if we applied ourselves so why has the same mentality not been shared for Medicine?

    Teaching young kids should be as important as having the ability to saves. In Medicine, you can be placed into a position where you are responsible whether a person lives or dies. But as a teacher, what you say and do can affect a childs psychological state and change their future (for better or for worse). So why do they not have to take an "aptitude test"?


  • #17
    jumpguy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,962 ✭✭✭jumpguy


    LittleMissLost wrote: »
    I think the HPAT is a load of ****.

    People spend hundreds and hundreds of euro doing preparation courses for it and are bound to do better than the person going in after only looking at the sample booklet.
    I know a good few people who have done excellently in the HPAT without a preparation course.

    Having done a preparation course myself, I would not advise them. Most of it felt wishy-washy (stuff basically like "how to think" and a bunch of anecdotes from unnamed "students" to underline various obvious points about the HPAT) and was 350€ I wish I didn't spend.

    Some common sense, appreciating how difficult the timing in the HPAT is, doing the sample booklets (which will help you with the timing), and asking people who have done it before for advice is a much cheaper and has about the same effectiveness as any prep course IMO. All that prep courses give you is maybe a bit of confidence - which one could gain with merely a little self-confidence.

    I think achieving at least 550 in the LC to have a good chance is a fair enough ask - much better than having to achieve 590 to have a chance.

    I think there needs to be more assessment that just written exams, with things such as interviews and stuff. However, in Ireland there would be a big problem with things like favouritism for unscrupulous reasons IMO. It would want to be a very well-monitored form of assessment.


  • #18
    2Scoops
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭2Scoops


    Dr. Ring wrote: »
    People who achieve over 500 points have obviously worked hard to get their results and should not be overlooked as a possible candidate for Medicine just because the HPAT sc**wed them up. Do you know what I mean?

    I do know what you mean - it sucks to be deprived of your training of choice based on small differences in an exam. Unfortunately, it's the necessary result of operating a strictly mathematical selection process. It's 'fair' to an extent but with high demand, talented people will inevitably lose out. But at least you can always try again.


  • #19
    electrictrad
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 367 ✭✭electrictrad


    Dr. Ring wrote: »
    Yeah I can see where you're coming from. And I agree with stuff you've said. But how can you rationalise that people who do poorly on the HPAT are not suited to the Medical profession when highly-ranked Doctors in our own country did poorly on the HPAT exam from February 2010? Doing badly in no way reflected their abilities as Doctors yet if we do badly we are deemed unsuitable? Do you see my point?

    I see your point. However, these people are the best doctors at the moment. . .taken from an outdated entry system based on their memory ability in an examhall. . .this exam is looking for a new type of doctor. . .and I can't see a better alternative for attracting people with average academic ability, but who would be the best, most compassionate doctors in history. . .I have a friend who has his heart set on medicine. . .and he didn't get an A in his junior cert. . .the opportunity offered by this test has turned him into a person who studies all day every day, because, even though he knows he can't get 600 points, he can get 520 or 530 if he tries really hard. . .and that might be enough for him to get the course of his dreams. . .a course he'd have never got 5 years ago. . .if he is suitable for medicine, he'll ace the test, and Ireland will have a good doctor they'd have never got otherwise

    . . .on the upside for medicine hopefuls like ourselves, there are 20 extra places in NUIG this year, and more are being brought onstream next year, if reports are to be believed. . .


  • #20
    LilMissCiara
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,292 ✭✭✭LilMissCiara


    I'm not convinced that HPAT preparation courses so much good (yes I'm sure they do some good but they won't change someones result by much I wouldn't think.)

    At the end of the day the HPAT is an aptitude test. Those who have an aptitude for becoming a doctor will do well.

    The system is not without it's flaws but it does help ensure people who have an aptitude for the course are the ones who get it.


  • #21
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭Dr. Ring


    2Scoops wrote: »
    If you're referring the IMJ study of a few months ago, I should point out that highly-ranked doctors did not do poorly on the HPAT in this study - they performed similar to junior doctors and medical students. So, maybe it's true that HPAT is testing a consistent factor associated with medical careers..?

    The study is actually quite poor. More here:
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=69824772

    Point taken. Some studies have very weak arguments and are only born out of spiteful bias towards the exam itself. But the very thing the HPAT tests for has been learned by many of the doctors of today through practical experience.

    I dont think you could actually say for 100% certainty that Medical applicants from as little as 10 years ago had the best logical reasoning and communication skills. But as they began to deal with patients on a daily bases, they have adapted and learned. In first year of Med school they would have been taught about bedside manner and they would have learned how to diagnose where communication is impeded or non existant. In the real world they would have had to make decisions and where they made the wrong ones, consequences would ensue and they would have learned from them.

    Potential Medical students today are not being given this same opportunity. I whole-heartedly appreciate the concept of the HPAT exam and I commend those who introduced it for all the right reasons. I just feel that it carries too much weight in deciding whether you'd make a good doctor or not. I know several doctors who all "learned their craft" by this method and they are better doctors as a result.


  • Advertisement
  • #22
    electrictrad
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 367 ✭✭electrictrad


    Dr. Ring wrote: »
    Teaching young kids should be as important as having the ability to saves. In Medicine, you can be placed into a position where you are responsible whether a person lives or dies. But as a teacher, what you say and do can affect a childs psychological state and change their future (for better or for worse). So why do they not have to take an "aptitude test"?

    True.

    In fact, this is probably where most degree courses are headed. . .

    Arts is not a fair example though IMO. Alot of art students have no intention of teaching. Some view it as a gateway degree, either to other degrees, to postgrads in subjects they couldn't get pts for, and others just want a degree to boost pay in civil service jobs. .

    I do agree that education courses specifically should require aptitude tests. . .hdips, primary teaching courses and other similar courses. . .nursing, physio, and podiatry are other courses where aptitude tests would be useful.. .

    However, courses like science, arts, and maths courses probably should remain CAO-based, given the academic nature of the courses, and the fairness of the CAO system. . .


  • #23
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭Dr. Ring


    2Scoops wrote: »
    But at least you can always try again.

    But isint that stement alone proving that the HPAT is flawed? If the HPAT is an exam that tests your aptitude for being a Doctor than you should do just as poorly one year as you did the year before. Yet now we're seeing people who are attempting the HPAT for a 2nd and 3rd time doing significantly better.


  • #24
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭Dr. Ring


    electrictrad wrote: »
    True.

    In fact, this is probably where most degree courses are headed. . .

    Arts is not a fair example though IMO. Alot of art students have no intention of teaching. Some view it as a gateway degree, either to other degrees, to postgrads in subjects they couldn't get pts for, and others just want a degree to boost pay in civil service jobs. .

    I do agree that education courses specifically should require aptitude tests. . .hdips, primary teaching courses and other similar courses. . .nursing, physio, and podiatry are other courses where aptitude tests would be useful.. .

    However, courses like science, arts, and maths courses probably should remain CAO-based, given the academic nature of the courses, and the fairness of the CAO system. . .

    If that's the case, any line of work that places you in a position with other people should have an aptitude test. Hairdressing, serving at a supermarket, being a librarian... All of these need good interpersonal skills too. I know that your life/wellbeing is not on the line with those professions but the point remains the same.


  • #25
    2Scoops
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭2Scoops


    Dr. Ring wrote: »
    But isint that stement alone proving that the HPAT is flawed? If the HPAT is an exam that tests your aptitude for being a Doctor than you should do just as poorly one year as you did the year before. Yet now we're seeing people who are attempting the HPAT for a 2nd and 3rd time doing significantly better.

    I suspect that this has far more to do with poor preparation in early attempts than anything else. There is a certain skill in taking a time-attack MCQ test that increases with experience. I think that with good preparation, the score would plateau.

    EDIT: and you could repeat the LC instead! Points go up there as well. It's completely uneven between individuals (different subjects) and shows a strong gender bias - and yet you rarely hear people complain about these issues and their implications on med entry. :pac:


  • #26
    ._.
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 334 ✭✭._.


    The way the HPAT scores are calculated is bollox.
    The amount of points you get for each question depends on how many other people get it correct, making it extremely difficult to do better than the average.

    As bad as the old system was, I think they've actually managed to make it worse.

    If you get 600 points, I personally believe that not doing well on some BS HPAT test shouldn't prevent you from doing whatever it is you want to do, because after that amount of work, you should be able to stroll into whatever course you feel like IMO.

    I know people who have gotten 600 points, but not offered medicine, which in my opinion is an absolute joke.

    They were put under so much pressure to do something about the situation with medicine they just decided to change something, which no actual emphasis on making entry into medicine better (and I don't mean easier).

    There's a world of improvements that could be made to the system, but i'll already be qualified as a Doctor before they've done anything judging by the rate they're going.

    And about these prep courses.. I went to one in Yeats Galway this year (for free though). It really did help.
    This year was my second time doing the HPAT (no course first time because it didn't exist back then), and in the 3 or so practice booklets + answers we got, section 3 went from being my worst section the first time, to my best section (judging by their answers).
    I'll see on Monday exactly how much of a difference it made..


  • #27
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭Dr. Ring


    2Scoops wrote: »
    I suspect that this has far more to do with poor preparation in early attempts than anything else. There is a certain skill in taking a time-attack MCQ test that increases with experience. I think that with good preparation, the score would plateau.

    But therein lies my point: Poor preperation. You should not have to prepare for the HPAT in any way, shape or form if it's underlying principles are to test someone's suitability. When taking the exam, most people know the time constraints yet still some run out of time. This indicates that they are incapable of adequately keeping track of time or there are simply too many questions and not enough time. But in failing, they LEARN and the next time they are much more conscious of the allocated time and do better.

    Feeding back to my point of learning through experience.


  • #28
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭Dr. Ring


    2Scoops wrote: »
    EDIT: and you could repeat the LC instead! Points go up there as well. It's completely uneven between individuals (different subjects) and shows a strong gender bias - and yet you rarely hear people complain about these issues and their implications on med entry. :pac:

    This much is also true. But do you not see how someone who gets 515 in the LC having to repeat is an absolute joke? People who get over 500 points are in the top 10% of results in the country. So they are academically gifted to start with.

    By any standards, 515 is an excellent LC but I actually know someone who got that last year and is repeating because they felt they would not do any better in the HPAT this year. If they get 600 this year (560) and do margainly better than the average in the HPAT they may get offered a place thus rendering the HPAT ineffective. DO you think?


  • #29
    kellogscoffey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 145 ✭✭kellogscoffey


    Dr. Ring wrote: »
    Before the introduction of the HPAT, Medical students were expected to achieve a mammoth 600 Leaving Certificate points which was, let’s face it, out of the reach of many people who would make wonderful, caring and diligent Doctors. Those who managed to achieve 600 points were, for the most part, incapable of communicating with their patients because they were out of the comfort zone of their books. The HPAT was set to change all that by allowing students to be deemed eligible for Medicine provided they achieved a much more attainable 480 LC points and take the HPAT (out of 300).


    Have to say i disagree fundamentally with this. 3 good friends of mine are applying for Med, and each of them is capable of 600 points, and put in enough work to deserve 600. I know these 3 would make excellent doctors and are all excellent communicators themselves. Its easy to claim that academic excellence fosters a social ineptitude or some form of communication deficieny, but in reality, it doesn't.

    Also, I personally think the minimum requirement of 480 points is too low. Medicine is among the most highly contested courses - its not unreasonable to think it should command an exceptional level of special treatment. I've no problem with the HPAT lowering the minimum points requirement, but in reality, noone is getting in to medicine with <530/540 points. I don't think asking for a minimum of 530/540 is unreasonable, given the prestige associated with the medicine.

    But that's just me :P


  • #30
    2Scoops
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭2Scoops


    ._. wrote: »
    The way the HPAT scores are calculated is bollox.
    The amount of points you get for each question depends on how many other people get it correct, making it extremely difficult to do better than the average.

    ~50% will always do better than average. :pac: Weighting scores actually improves the spread of the distribution, making it easier to identify people who do exceptionally well.
    If you get 600 points, I personally believe that not doing well on some BS HPAT test shouldn't prevent you from doing whatever it is you want to do, because after that amount of work, you should be able to stroll into whatever course you feel like IMO. I know people who have gotten 600 points, but not offered medicine, which in my opinion is an absolute joke.

    Why, if a person can get 600 points in the LC, can they not even get an average HPAT? Something doesn't add up there, I'm afraid. I would much rather a 520 pointer with a stellar HPAT than a 600 pointer who can't get answer a few straight forward questions.


  • Advertisement
  • #31
    NotExactly
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 814 ✭✭✭NotExactly


    Dr. Ring wrote: »
    But isint that stement alone proving that the HPAT is flawed? If the HPAT is an exam that tests your aptitude for being a Doctor than you should do just as poorly one year as you did the year before. Yet now we're seeing people who are attempting the HPAT for a 2nd and 3rd time doing significantly better.

    You would think that but no. You can improve yourself at everything. When you're born you're not born to be a doctor. You can improve at IQ tests if you keep practicing them, there's tonnes of more of examples.


  • #32
    LittleMissLost
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭LittleMissLost


    I know someone who got 600 points and did the HPAT but did not get into medicine.

    That person is now doing dentistry in Trinity.. just sayin' ..


  • #33
    2Scoops
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭2Scoops


    Dr. Ring wrote: »
    But therein lies my point: Poor preperation. You should not have to prepare for the HPAT in any way, shape or form if it's underlying principles are to test someone's suitability.

    It's easy to misunderstand the power of the HPAT, or any test, to measure 'innate' qualities. With preparation, the scores will plateau; that means if everyone prepared equally well, some would still never get a good score. The value of the HPAT is predicate on people preparing properly and they have never suggested otherwise, though I readily admit it's the common perception.


  • #34
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭Dr. Ring


    kellogscoffey wrote: »
    Have to say i disagree fundamentally with this. 3 good friends of mine are applying for Med, and each of them is capable of 600 points, and put in enough work to deserve 600. I know these 3 would make excellent doctors and are all excellent communicators themselves. Its easy to claim that academic excellence fosters a social ineptitude or some form of communication deficieny, but in reality, it doesn't.

    Also, I personally think the minimum requirement of 480 points is too low. Medicine is among the most highly contested courses - its not unreasonable to think it should command an exceptional level of special treatment. I've no problem with the HPAT lowering the minimum points requirement, but in reality, noone is getting in to medicine with <530/540 points. I don't think asking for a minimum of 530/540 is unreasonable, given the prestige associated with the medicine.

    But that's just me :P

    I agree 480 is too low. And just to clarify, I did say "for the most part" when referring to socially awkward, 600 point Doctors. There are some out there who are very intelligent but at the same time are lovely, caring people. But have you never had an experience with one of those Doctors who cannot look you in the eye, keeps scribbling down their notes and is generally difficult to have a conversation with?

    Personally I have (one in the last 3 months) and I have to admit that it made an already tense/anxiety-filled situation ten times worse. I was far more reluctant to reveal any information to that Doctor because I felt as though I was inconveniencing him by being in his presence or requiring his help.


  • #35
    2Scoops
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭2Scoops


    Dr. Ring wrote: »
    But do you not see how someone who gets 515 in the LC having to repeat is an absolute joke?

    I agree, but the CAO is operating a meritocracy - how can you justify giving a place to someone with less points than another?


  • #36
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭Dr. Ring


    2Scoops wrote: »
    I would much rather a 520 pointer with a stellar HPAT than a 600 pointer who can't get answer a few straight forward questions.

    Straight forward? Have you actually seen some of the questions the HPAT boasts? Some are quite difficult at the best of times to deduce. Add that to the fact that you may only have 1-2 minutes to answer and it's a disaster waiting to happen.


  • Advertisement
  • #37
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭Dr. Ring


    NotExactly wrote: »
    You would think that but no. You can improve yourself at everything. When you're born you're not born to be a doctor. You can improve at IQ tests if you keep practicing them, there's tonnes of more of examples.

    So therefore your point is you can increase your aptitude for being a Doctor with lots of practise? Does that in itself not tell you that the HPAT is flawed?

    With the HPAT, the idea is either you have it or you dont. Yet your saying that you can get better with practise? Surely that supports my point that it's not working?


  • #38
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭Dr. Ring


    2Scoops wrote: »
    It's easy to misunderstand the power of the HPAT, or any test, to measure 'innate' qualities. With preparation, the scores will plateau; that means if everyone prepared equally well, some would still never get a good score. The value of the HPAT is predicate on people preparing properly and they have never suggested otherwise, though I readily admit it's the common perception.

    Yes but the point you made suggested that those who did not prepare for the HPAT generally did worse than those who did. Not pondering what would happen if everyone did the same preperation.


  • #39
    2Scoops
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭2Scoops


    Dr. Ring wrote: »
    Straight forward? Have you actually seen some of the questions the HPAT boasts? Some are quite difficult at the best of times to deduce. Add that to the fact that you may only have 1-2 minutes to answer and it's a disaster waiting to happen.

    I have seen them, and they make sense for the most part. People who do poorly are people who can't see through the questions and those are people with lower reading comprehension and situational awareness. And the purpose of the test is to stratify people on these qualities.


  • #40
    LilMissCiara
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,292 ✭✭✭LilMissCiara


    Dr. Ring wrote: »
    So therefore your point is you can increase your aptitude for being a Doctor with lots of practise? Does that in itself not tell you that the HPAT is flawed?

    With the HPAT, the idea is either you have it or you dont. Yet your saying that you can get better with practise? Surely that supports my point that it's not working?

    Wouldn't a limit on taking the test twice solve this problem (I say twice rather than once because a person's performance may be greatly effected the first time (by a bereavement, illness etc.) so a 2nd chance option should be in place.


  • #41
    2Scoops
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭2Scoops


    Dr. Ring wrote: »
    Yes but the point you made suggested that those who did not prepare for the HPAT generally did worse than those who did. Not pondering what would happen if everyone did the same preperation.

    I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. I readily admit that preparation affects HPAT score. But I also accept the validity of HPAT in those who prepare properly. There is no contradiction, except to those who believe the test result should be same regardless of preparation.


  • Advertisement
  • #42
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭Dr. Ring


    2Scoops wrote: »
    I agree, but the CAO is operating a meritocracy - how can you justify giving a place to someone with less points than another?

    I cant and I'm not trying to. The HPAT was designed to give a chance to those who would generally fall short of Medicine's demanding points requirements. 480 is currently the threshold for eligibility (albeit too low). 515 is an excellent Leaving Cert score yet because this person did worse than someone who spent money on prep courses and did better, they lost out. Both applicant may have been just as suitable to start with but the prep course gave the latter the edge. Thus the HPAT is failing. That's all I'm saying buddy.


  • #43
    2Scoops
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭2Scoops


    Dr. Ring wrote: »
    I cant and I'm not trying to. The HPAT was designed to give a chance to those who would generally fall short of Medicine's demanding points requirements. 480 is currently the threshold for eligibility (albeit too low). 515 is an excellent Leaving Cert score yet because this person did worse than someone who spent money on prep courses and did better, they lost out. Both applicant may have been just as suitable to start with but the prep course gave the latter the edge. Thus the HPAT is failing. That's all I'm saying buddy.

    Good preparation does not need a prep course, as some have already pointed out. Prepare properly once and it won't matter what everyone else is doing. The HPAT isn't perfect, but I don't believe it's failing. It's certainly an improvement on LC alone.


  • #44
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭Dr. Ring


    2Scoops wrote: »
    I have seen them, and they make sense for the most part. People who do poorly are people who can't see through the questions and those are people with lower reading comprehension and situational awareness. And the purpose of the test is to stratify people on these qualities.

    But the foundation for their reading comprehension was sewn in Leaving Cert when they had to read as much as possible, read the question and extract the answer. You dont have time for all that in the HPAT. So to do well, you have to completely change the way you approach comprehension-based tasks, effectively learning all over again ("learning through experience").

    Situational awareness is a fair point and I agree totally. You have to be able to assess the situation you are in and address it accordingly. But how easily is that done in 2 minutes? I know you may say that a second can be the difference between life or death in the medical proffession but again, you learn these things as you are exposed to the real Medical world. You get faster on your feet, assessing situations becomes easier...


  • #45
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭Dr. Ring


    LilMissCiara wrote: »
    Wouldn't a limit on taking the test twice solve this problem (I say twice rather than once because a person's performance may be greatly effected the first time (by a bereavement, illness etc.) so a 2nd chance option should be in place.

    But then you essentially make the HPAT the bases for entry to Medicine. You can do as well as you want in the LC but if you do moderately or poorly in the HPAT you're essentially scr**ed.


  • #46
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭Dr. Ring


    2Scoops wrote: »
    It's certainly an improvement on LC alone.

    I totally agree. It is certainly a step in the right direction.


  • #47
    2Scoops
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,845 ✭✭✭2Scoops


    Dr. Ring wrote: »
    But the foundation for their reading comprehension was sewn in Leaving Cert when they had to read as much as possible, read the question and extract the answer. You dont have time for all that in the HPAT. So to do well, you have to completely change the way you approach comprehension-based tasks, effectively learning all over again ("learning through experience").

    I actually disagree that the LC is a rigorous test of reading comprehension. It's far too easy to latch on to a few key words in LC exams and commence the waffling. Literacy in Irish students is at rock bottom (as anyone in 3rd level education can tell you) precisely because the of the LC.

    2 min is enough time to answer HPAT questions. They're not impossible. Yes, it requires you stop thinking in the lazy way that the LC rewards. But clearly many students are able for it. The ones who don't do well, even if good preparation, will have to ask serious questions of themselves.


  • #48
    LilMissCiara
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,292 ✭✭✭LilMissCiara


    Dr. Ring wrote: »
    But then you essentially make the HPAT the bases for entry to Medicine. You can do as well as you want in the LC but if you do moderately or poorly in the HPAT you're essentially scr**ed.

    Yeah, which means you don't have an aptitude for medicine so you shouldn't be getting the course!

    It allows the HPAT to be more of an aptitude test than a test you can study for and keep trying.


  • #49
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭Dr. Ring


    LilMissCiara wrote: »
    Yeah, which means you don't have an aptitude for medicine so you shouldn't be getting the course!

    It allows the HPAT to be more of an aptitude test than a test you can study for and keep trying.

    But because you can get better by doing it again/preparing for it, it's success as an aptitute test is diminished. By placing a cap on the number of times one can sit the exam, all you're doing is preventing them from getting better at it. But that does not mean that their first or second attempt is a true representation of how good/bad a doctor they would be.

    Essentially, if it was an accurate aptitude test, you should get roughly the same result one year as you would the next. You're either good and suitable or you're not. But, as we've seen, people have proven (by repeating the HPAT) that they can do better so it therefore cannot be classed as an accurate aptitude test through which prospective Medical students can be decided.


  • #50
    jumpguy
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,962 ✭✭✭jumpguy


    Dr. Ring wrote: »
    Essentially, if it was an accurate aptitude test, you should get roughly the same result one year as you would the next. You're either good and suitable or you're not. But, as we've seen, people have proven (by repeating the HPAT) that they can do better so it therefore cannot be classed as an accurate aptitude test through which prospective Medical students can be decided.
    The HPAT supposedly depends on skills you build up over the course of your life. In my opinion, sitting the HPAT itself and doing the exam in actual test conditions is quite an experience, as it the LC itself. There's quite a lot of learning and personality-developing to be done in a year, especially when you're young.

    You're assuming if someone sits the HPAT in 2009, they will be the exact same type of person sitting the HPAT in 2010. To truly test this idea, you would have to get a person sitting the HPAT one day, then sitting a different HPAT the next day.


  • #51
    Dr. Ring
    Closed Accounts Posts: 123 ✭✭Dr. Ring


    2Scoops wrote: »
    I actually disagree that the LC is a rigorous test of reading comprehension. It's far too easy to latch on to a few key words in LC exams and commence the waffling. Literacy in Irish students is at rock bottom (as anyone in 3rd level education can tell you) precisely because the of the LC.

    2 min is enough time to answer HPAT questions. They're not impossible. Yes, it requires you stop thinking in the lazy way that the LC rewards. But clearly many students are able for it. The ones who don't do well, even if good preparation, will have to ask serious questions of themselves.

    Ok. That's a fair point. But you're swimming in murky waters there.

    I think we all agree that the LC needs serious revamping, especially in the area you've mentioned. However, the HPAT expects a level of comprehension-ability completely different to that of the "lazy" Leaving Certificate. So how can it be fair to everyone? For 5/6 years, they have been allowed to get "lazy" and then they are simply expected to have a much higher ability at comprehensions in order to excel in the HPAT. In order for everyone to have a fair shot at the HPAT, they way comprehensions are addressed in the LC needs to be modified. Agreed or disagreed?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement