Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Water doesn't help dehydration

  • 18-11-2011 11:15AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,567 ✭✭✭✭


    hot on the heels of the US fruitiness, and not to be outdone, the EU have decided drinking water doesn't help prevent dehydration :pac:
    BRUSSELS bureaucrats have been ridiculed after banning drink manufacturers from claiming that water can prevent dehydration.

    EU officials concluded that, following a three-year investigation, there was no evidence to prove the previously undisputed fact.

    Producers of bottled water are now forbidden by law from making the claim and will face a two-year jail sentence if they defy the edict.

    Health guidelines state clearly that drinking water helps avoid dehydration, and that people should drink at least 1.2 litres per day.

    German professors Dr Andreas Hahn and Dr Moritz Hagenmeyer, who advise food manufacturers on how to advertise their products, asked the European Commission if the claim could be made on labels.

    They compiled what they assumed was an uncontroversial statement in order to test new laws which allow products to claim they can reduce the risk of disease, subject to EU approval.

    They applied for the right to state that “regular consumption of significant amounts of water can reduce the risk of development of dehydration” as well as preventing a decrease in performance.

    However, last February, the European Food Standards Authority (EFSA) refused to approve the statement.

    A meeting of 21 scientists in Parma, Italy, concluded that reduced water content in the body was a symptom of dehydration and not something that drinking water could subsequently control.

    Now the EFSA verdict has been turned into an EU directive which was issued on Wednesday.

    EU regulations, which aim to uphold food standards across member states, are frequently criticised.

    Rules banning bent bananas and curved cucumbers were scrapped in 2008 after causing international ridicule.

    Prof Hahn, from the Institute for Food Science and Human Nutrition at Hanover Leibniz University, said the European Commission had made another mistake with its latest ruling.

    “What is our reaction to the outcome? Let us put it this way: We are neither surprised nor delighted.

    “The European Commission is wrong; it should have authorised the claim. That should be more than clear to anyone who has consumed water in the past, and who has not? We fear there is something wrong in the state of Europe.”

    Prof Brian Ratcliffe, spokesman for the Nutrition Society, said dehydration was usually caused by a clinical condition and that one could remain adequately hydrated without drinking water.

    He said: “The EU is saying that this does not reduce the risk of dehydration and that is correct.

    “This claim is trying to imply that there is something special about bottled water which is not a reasonable claim.”
    http://www.independent.ie/world-news/europe/looney-rules-eu-bans-claim-that-water-can-prevent-dehydration-2939196.html


Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,397 ✭✭✭✭Degsy


    They'll be selling Dehydrated water in packets next.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 30 MegaWattKungFu


    Here is an interesting article on it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,388 ✭✭✭✭rubadub


    You just can't win.

    If they had allowed it then the scum journos would be on twisting the fact that soft drinks are high in water saying "EU say fanta cures disease".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26 jmvane15


    What?? How does water not help dehydration? That's one of the most ridiculous things I've heard.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭Barry.Oglesby


    I always seem to be recommending books BUT... I'm going to recommend 2 books.

    Firstly if you haven't read Bad Science by Ben Goldacre, it's a must read for anyone looking to scrutinise the science we see in the everyday media.

    Secondly, Flat Earth News by Nick Davies should give you a healthy dose of scepticism about ANYTHING you read in the newspapers. PR runs the news, and this is another example of how PR dictates how a story is perceived.

    Look deeper and then see what has really happened.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,919 ✭✭✭✭Gummy Panda


    I always seem to be recommending books BUT... I'm going to recommend 2 books.

    Firstly if you haven't read Bad Science by Ben Goldacre, it's a must read for anyone looking to scrutinise the science we see in the everyday media.

    I just finally bought this on my kindle. Thanks for reminding me


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,259 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    jmvane15 wrote: »
    What?? How does water not help dehydration? That's one of the most ridiculous things I've heard.
    No, its saying that that water doesn't prevent it significantly more than other drinks, which it probably doesn't.

    If they granted the claim to water. Coca-cola could apply and would have to be granted, which is obviously a bad thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 205 ✭✭robodonkey


    I always seem to be recommending books BUT... I'm going to recommend 2 books.

    Firstly if you haven't read Bad Science by Ben Goldacre, it's a must read for anyone looking to scrutinise the science we see in the everyday media.

    Secondly, Flat Earth News by Nick Davies should give you a healthy dose of scepticism about ANYTHING you read in the newspapers. PR runs the news, and this is another example of how PR dictates how a story is perceived.

    Look deeper and then see what has really happened.

    +100000

    also see www.badscience.net


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,491 ✭✭✭Yahew


    The response here is a bit tribal. The EU, or one of it's technical teams, produces a report. It is rubbished by Eurosceptics, and the Daily Mail. The Guardian produces an anti-Mail article, rather than one which is necessarily pro-science. This is merely proof of a tribal in-grouping, rather than a response to the actual report. Had the report been Irish, or American, it would have garnered laughs. Had the Daily Mail not noticed it, the Guardian response might be different. Had it been produced by the Conservatives, they would have laughed.

    In any case I read the guardian reputal. His main points are:

    1) If I drink half a pint of bottled water while running through a desert in the blistering sun, I'll still end up dehydrated
    2) if I drink several bottles today, that won't prevent me from dehydrating tomorrow.

    Both are weak arguments to say the least. They would prohibit the recommendation of 2,500 calories a day for a man, and 5 items of fruit because

    1) If you are a cross country runner you would need more than that.
    2) Even if you eat your 5 pieces of fruit - what about tomorrow.

    Spurious rebuttals. Surely its valid to claim that drinking water, for an average person on an average day, will prohibit dehydration.


Advertisement