Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The unintended consequence of bailing out the banks.

  • 10-08-2013 10:41AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭


    To compete with the rest of the world, Ireland has to become a low cost economy. To become a low cost economy wages/dole must fall to make businesses competitive with the rest of the world. If wages fall, people will not be able to pay their celtic tiger era mortgages. If people can`t pay their mortgages the banks will need another bailout. The government owns the banks so the government would need another bailout.

    So the more competitive Ireland becomes the more bankrupt it becomes. This is the unintended consequence of bailing out the banks. The only way around this is to re-privatize the bank debt. Competition must be re-enabled in Ireland. Without competition, the Irish will not have a future worth living.

    Proof of this is abundant. All one has to do is compare the increasing interest being paid on the money the country has borrowed to the pathetic economic growth the economy has to show for it. One should never borrow to invest in the stock market so why should it be any different when it comes to investing in a bankrupt country. When interest rates rise on government debt - that is when the real fun will begin.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,797 ✭✭✭KyussBishop


    Why do people defend this effective devaluation of peoples wages ('internal devaluation'), increasing peoples cost of living in proportion to wages, yet oppose an actual devaluation (which can be temporary, gradually revaluing the currency once full economic output is reached), which has the same negatives but which also makes us more competitive, while also devaluing the debts? (solving a portion of that problem too)

    Internal devaluation seems to land all the pain of the economic crisis on the worst off, whereas a more general devaluation spreads it more evenly (while also solving more of the problems). It's not the solution I advocate, it seems to be an inconsistency in arguments though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,277 ✭✭✭SeanW


    Our debt is in Euro, including the damned government debt to bail out the banks. We can't devalue that. Given that our so called "freinds" in the European Union lent our spineless government money for the sole purpose of putting the bank debt onto the backs of the people, telling them to go jump in the lake might be a good start.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭antoobrien


    SeanW wrote: »
    Our debt is in Euro, including the damned government debt to bail out the banks. We can't devalue that. Given that our so called "freinds" in the European Union lent our spineless government money for the sole purpose of putting the bank debt onto the backs of the people, telling them to go jump in the lake might be a good start.

    But the amount of money actually put into the banks from borrowed sources (i.e. excluding the money put into AIB & BOI from the NPRF) - 32bn - is a very small portion of the overall debt (192bn).

    In the end of 2007 we had a debt of 47.2bn, it now stands at 192.5. Excluding the PNs (which have been converted into normal bonds) between 2008 & 2013 we borrowed 113.3bn to pay for services.

    To put that into context that pays for (in 2012 spending equivalents):
    5.6 years of DSP expenditure
    8.1 years of Dept Health
    12.6 years education spending


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭gaius c


    The debt cannot be repaid and the creditors need to accept that for them to see their money again, they need to talk to us about how best to make this happen.

    I'm disagreeing with The Floppy Haired One lately but I think he's right that we'll have to leave the euro.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    Why do people defend this effective devaluation of peoples wages ('internal devaluation'), increasing peoples cost of living in proportion to wages, yet oppose an actual devaluation (which can be temporary, gradually revaluing the currency once full economic output is reached), which has the same negatives but which also makes us more competitive, while also devaluing the debts? (solving a portion of that problem too)

    Largely because the Germans have a very long-held fear of inflation that almost borders on the irrational which has hamstrung the ECB by not giving it the power to do anything approaching a devaluation or serious quantitative easing programme.

    Politically, this is just not sustainable in the medium term. Spain for example will either leave the Euro or have a massive social and political mess on its hands very soon.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,262 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Bank%252520Recapitalisation%252520Payments%25255B10%25255D.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,262 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    To compete with the rest of the world, Ireland has to become a low cost economy. To become a low cost economy wages/dole must fall to make businesses competitive with the rest of the world. If wages fall, people will not be able to pay their celtic tiger era


    High competitiveness does not necessarily require low wages.


    Switz, Denmark, Sweden, Austria, Germany - all reasonably successful economies (mostly), but not with low wages.

    A successfuly economy should have strong wages, as a reflection of strong productivity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,169 ✭✭✭dlouth15


    antoobrien wrote: »
    But the amount of money actually put into the banks from borrowed sources (i.e. excluding the money put into AIB & BOI from the NPRF) - 32bn - is a very small portion of the overall debt (192bn).
    Not sure it is valid not to include the money from the NPRF. It still increased our net indebtedness by 32bn. It was money that could have been used elsewhere but instead was sunk into the banks thus increasing the need to borrow to fund other things.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭gaius c


    Geuze wrote: »
    High competitiveness does not necessarily require low wages.


    Switz, Denmark, Sweden, Austria, Germany - all reasonably successful economies (mostly), but not with low wages.

    A successfuly economy should have strong wages, as a reflection of strong productivity.

    Yes and it's because they export things that are actually made in their countries, not just "value add" for tax purposes.

    Until we figure out how to make "unsexy" businesses like lumber processing (just one example) work again in Ireland, there will be no recovery.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,797 ✭✭✭KyussBishop


    SpaceTime wrote: »
    Largely because the Germans have a very long-held fear of inflation that almost borders on the irrational which has hamstrung the ECB by not giving it the power to do anything approaching a devaluation or serious quantitative easing programme.

    Politically, this is just not sustainable in the medium term. Spain for example will either leave the Euro or have a massive social and political mess on its hands very soon.
    True, that is certainly the case with Germany - I just don't get all of the posters online, holding mutually contradictory views regarding effective (internal) devaluation, vs actual devaluation, especially as we can logically see precisely why internal devaluation just harms the economy even further

    You'd be engaging in a race-to-the-bottom in wages, which harms demand, to compete for providing exports, where almost every country in the world is trying to export more, and almost none importing more - which is just stupid because someone needs to increase imports for anyone to increase exports.

    If you sum up the exports vs imports of all countries in the world, you get "World Exports - World Imports = 0", which is a factually true accounting identity, so it's really obvious that countries can't just export their way out of this crisis.

    It's just plain bad economics, which seems to show a lack of understanding of international trade and macroeconomics, and a kind of narrow/insular attitude of "we'll compete with other countries to take their share of existing exports" - without realizing just how stupid and self-defeating that is.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭realitykeeper


    Geuze wrote: »
    High competitiveness does not necessarily require low wages.


    Switz, Denmark, Sweden, Austria, Germany - all reasonably successful economies (mostly), but not with low wages.

    A successfuly economy should have strong wages, as a reflection of strong productivity.

    I agree but unfortunately many of the high end jobs in this country have to be filled by foreign workers. Irish graduates lack language skills. For years the multinational companies have been calling for more emphasis to be put on maths and science subjects but until recently Irish students have been ignoring this fact and have instead been doing courses which are of no use in the real world.

    For example, social studies and philosophy are not in great demand in the pharmaceutical sector or in companies focused on engineering. The humanities may be used in the HSE but unfortunately we can`t all work for the HSE - we need people working in the real world in order to pay for everything.

    Even with an adequately skilled workforce it is doubtful that the revenue would be sufficient to balance expenditure in the economy. In the past the private sector and many individual citizens were borrowing too much which they subsequently invested foolishly. Now it is the state which is borrowing too much and investing foolishly. This is why the country`s debt is rising at an alarming pace and the country is getting precious little economic growth to show for it.

    Recently the Irish examiner reported that Irish household debt has decreased by 31.5 billion since 2008. Unfortunately the government has been borrowing 15 to 20 billion per year so overall debt in the country is increasing rapidly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    Geuze wrote: »
    High competitiveness does not necessarily require low wages.


    Switz, Denmark, Sweden, Austria, Germany - all reasonably successful economies (mostly), but not with low wages.

    A successfuly economy should have strong wages, as a reflection of strong productivity.

    Bear in mind that Greeks work the longest hours in Europe for almost the lowest pay and look where they are!

    It's all about productivity per unit of labour and having valuable exports or internationally demanded services.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭gaius c


    SpaceTime wrote: »
    Bear in mind that Greeks work the longest hours in Europe for almost the lowest pay and look where they are!

    It's all about productivity per unit of labour and having valuable exports or internationally demanded services.

    Sounds incredible considering the coverage their work practices have received. Have you a link for this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,336 ✭✭✭Mr.Micro


    SpaceTime wrote: »
    Bear in mind that Greeks work the longest hours in Europe for almost the lowest pay and look where they are!

    It's all about productivity per unit of labour and having valuable exports or internationally demanded services.
    Nationwide spot inspections find one in two Greek businesses cheating the government in some way

    http://www.therecord.com/news-story/4026511-nationwide-spot-inspections-find-one-in-two-greek-businesses-cheating-the-government-in-some-way/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    The stats:

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AonYZs4MzlZbdDNoOUlYZDk4YUp2ZDFJUVAwNXpXYkE#gid=0

    Source ONS / Eurostat

    Greece 42.2 hours
    Ireland 35 hours
    UK 36.3 hours
    Germany 35.6 hours
    Denmark 33.8 hours

    and so on.

    The Greeks definitely aren't lazy! They're just badly paid.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭OMD


    SpaceTime wrote: »
    The stats:

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AonYZs4MzlZbdDNoOUlYZDk4YUp2ZDFJUVAwNXpXYkE#gid=0

    Source ONS / Eurostat

    Greece 42.2 hours
    Ireland 35 hours
    UK 36.3 hours
    Germany 35.6 hours
    Denmark 33.8 hours

    and so on.

    The Greeks definitely aren't lazy! They're just badly paid.

    Interesting. Based on this full time workers in Ireland work joint lowest number of hours.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 392 ✭✭skafish


    OMD wrote: »
    Interesting. Based on this full time workers in Ireland work joint lowest number of hours.


    This may have changed in the last two years. Haddington road agreement added 2 hours per week for most PS workers, which will have increased the average somewhat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,633 ✭✭✭maninasia


    If you did the same survey in China you would probably find 95% of the companies cheating the government in some way. There's much more to the story.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,157 ✭✭✭srsly78


    SpaceTime wrote: »
    The stats:

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AonYZs4MzlZbdDNoOUlYZDk4YUp2ZDFJUVAwNXpXYkE#gid=0

    Source ONS / Eurostat

    Greece 42.2 hours
    Ireland 35 hours
    UK 36.3 hours
    Germany 35.6 hours
    Denmark 33.8 hours

    and so on.

    The Greeks definitely aren't lazy! They're just badly paid.

    They have very many self-employed people. This basically means a lot of those hours are spent watching tv sitting around in family-owned shops. So they may seem to work a lot of hours, but have very little productivity to show for it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    Well, hours worked ≠ productivity.

    You'll notice the most developed countries in Europe have the fewest working hours.

    It's also about value-added products / value-added internationally traded services. A country like Greece is hugely reliant on low-value added products and tourism. Where as say Denmark, or Ireland is the other extreme where a very large % of the income is made from very high value added products with very little reliance on tourism.

    A lot of the lumping economies together into handy and insulting acronyms i.e. PIGS is pretty pointless as other than being in a crisis and having big debts, they don't share a lot else in common and got there for quite different reasons.

    There's been quite a lot of lazy, tabloid reporting of the Eurozone crisis over the last few years.

    The German insistence on internal devaluation by squeezing wages is only going to make a crisis worse by making private debts even more unpayable and it's not really going to make those countries any more competitive either. All it will do is cause their domestic economies to implode by driving up unemployment and driving down consumer spending.

    The other thing I think that's being completely forgotten about is that we Ireland, Spain, and the UK too have a history of quite high inflation and devaluations. If you consider people who bought their houses in the 1970s/80s tended to borrow to the pin of their collar and then within a decade or so, inflation reduced their mortgages to very affordable levels.

    There was a notion in Ireland and Spain that this is how things always work, because this is how they have always worked to date.

    However, we bolted our selves to Germany and France two countries with a history of decades of price stability. Then when we entered our usual property bubble mode, there was no prospect of inflation / devaluation to deal with the excess heat.

    I think we've basically plugged two completely incompatible systems together with rather disastrous consequences.

    Ireland basically runs a UK/US axis economy and always has with boom/bust cycles and relatively high inflation over the past 30+ years.
    Spain, Italy, Portugal and Greece run a Southern European approach to things which tends to be about inflation and devaluation as a tool. There's also a long history of very heavy state involvement in their economies with public-expenditure driven job-creation having been quite normal.

    Spain for example, had huge levels of state involvement in its economy both during and after the dictatorship during the Spanish Miracle (1959-74)

    While Germany and France tended to run a system of low inflation and price stability since WWII.

    It seems to me that we've been shoehorned into a single model which is very much the central European / German one and I'm not sure that it fits all sizes very well at all.

    You can see exactly why the UK, Sweden and Denmark opted out.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,007 ✭✭✭Phill Ewinn


    To compete with the rest of the world, Ireland has to become a low cost economy. To become a low cost economy wages/dole must fall to make businesses competitive with the rest of the world. If wages fall, people will not be able to pay their celtic tiger era mortgages. If people can`t pay their mortgages the banks will need another bailout. The government owns the banks so the government would need another bailout.

    So the more competitive Ireland becomes the more bankrupt it becomes. This is the unintended consequence of bailing out the banks. The only way around this is to re-privatize the bank debt. Competition must be re-enabled in Ireland. Without competition, the Irish will not have a future worth living.

    Proof of this is abundant. All one has to do is compare the increasing interest being paid on the money the country has borrowed to the pathetic economic growth the economy has to show for it. One should never borrow to invest in the stock market so why should it be any different when it comes to investing in a bankrupt country. When interest rates rise on government debt - that is when the real fun will begin.

    Don't think anyone really believes that, or ever did really. Plenty of successful companies.operate in "high cost" countries. The idea that we're overcharging companies for Labour is ridiculous.

    Whats the standard unit cost for labour then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,872 ✭✭✭View


    SpaceTime wrote: »
    The German insistence on internal devaluation by squeezing wages is only going to make a crisis worse

    A good post but Germany is not engaging in any such insistence.

    Rather it a reality that the "bailout" member states face as they can't continue to overspend indefinitely and, more importantly, neither the markets nor the other EU member states will loan them money to do so.
    SpaceTime wrote: »
    The other thing I think that's being completely forgotten about is that we Ireland, Spain, and the UK too have a history of quite high inflation and devaluations.

    A large part of the reason we opted for the ERM first and then the Euro was to get away from such a high inflation model. Sadly, we only partly took that idea on board as public spending was allowed to increase well above the low inflation target rate.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,561 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    Geuze wrote: »
    High competitiveness does not necessarily require low wages.


    Switz, Denmark, Sweden, Austria, Germany - all reasonably successful economies (mostly), but not with low wages.

    A successfuly economy should have strong wages, as a reflection of strong productivity.

    Yes but those strong wages should be set by the market in those strong economies. Strong economy leads to strong wages, but artificially setting the minimum at too high a level does not make the economy stronger.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,633 ✭✭✭maninasia


    View wrote: »
    A good post but Germany is not engaging in any such insistence.

    Rather it a reality that the "bailout" member states face as they can't continue to overspend indefinitely and, more importantly, neither the markets nor the other EU member states will loan them money to do so.



    A large part of the reason we opted for the ERM first and then the Euro was to get away from such a high inflation model. Sadly, we only partly took that idea on board as public spending was allowed to increase well above the low inflation target rate.

    Correct, for instance Ireland is a sovereign nation, it could choose NOT to take the bailout money. It was naive in the extreme for the public to think Germany would not takes themselves as the priority.

    You can't complain after you take the money, you've already given away your ability to govern to others.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭realitykeeper


    Don't think anyone really believes that, or ever did really. Plenty of successful companies.operate in "high cost" countries. The idea that we're overcharging companies for Labour is ridiculous.

    Whats the standard unit cost for labour then?
    The successful companies you refer to need engineers and people with language skills. Unfortunately Ireland does not have enough graduates with these skills so those jobs have to be filled by qualified immigrants. The Irish tend to gravitate toward social studies and the like.

    So in order to provide productive work for the unskilled Irish and people with irrelevant qualifications - the country needs factories for the mass production of everyday goods for the domestic market and export. This requires cheap labour.

    Dreaming of growing the economy is counterproductive because growth or the supply of revenue was never the problem. The problem is overspending and the policy of borrowing in the hope the economy will grow faster than the debt is not working. Recessions/depressions are part of the natural economic cycle and the depression that was supposed to happen in 2008 cannot be stopped - although the borrowing the country has done since 2008 will make it much worse.

    Foolishly, the government has put itself in a position where it becomes more and more bankrupt as it tries to control expenditure. If the government is serious about paying the banks debts then the austerity it must impose would have to increase by a factor of 10 (although with this level of austerity there would be no need to pay the bank debt because the country would be solvent again.)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    Actually, there's more to it than just Irish tendencies.

    In any given population, a relatively small % of people will tend to go into computer science's hard-core coding areas.
    So, within the Irish population (which is very small) only a relatively small number of people will ever have the ability to go into that area.

    We should improve science education and computer science at second and primary level if we want to encourage more people into sciences. There should definitely be more focus on areas like pure science and engineering though. I would definitely agree with that.

    On the language issues. That's one you're not really going to be able to address for two reasons.

    1) The companies in general want (and can easily get) native speakers / near native level by just recruiting EU-wide.

    2) Because Ireland speaks a very major language i.e. English, people don't really grow up speaking two or three languages like they would in a small country like say Belgium or the Netherlands or parts of Scandinavia. We are just not exposed to that and we generally don't have any need to speak other languages to access pop culture.

    If you grow up speaking English or Spanish which are two major world languages, everything's at your disposal in your native language. French also has a huge media and pop culture which tends to mean that French speakers also tend to exist in their own bubble.

    If you speak German for example, you're more likely to have to reach out to English pop culture / movies / tv / books etc than a French speaker might.

    ...

    Unfortunately, I don't really think that we're going to see Irish people suddenly becoming multi-lingual.

    We should definitely improve language teaching and I think we need to introduce modern languages (other than Irish) at primary level from day one. They are much easier to teach too as there's just so much pop culture to use if you're teaching Spanish or French or German kids can actually watch TV, film, read really good books etc etc.

    So, they'll learn quickly.

    ...

    I also think we need to be actively recruiting Eastern European residents who have degrees in say Polish or Russian to become teachers here. There's a huge untapped resource and Polish is a HUGE language in terms of how big Poland is and how economically significant it will become.

    It seems daft to be focusing on French almost exclusively when we've a big population of native speaking Polish people and we now have loads of direct ties with Eastern Europe via people living here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭realitykeeper


    Ireland`s financial difficulty will not be fixed by the present government. By bailing out the banks, the government has but itself in a position where it is forced to keep labour costs high. Consequently Ireland cannot compete economically. The more Ireland tries to compete the more bankrupt it becomes because low pay leads to mortgage arrears for the state owned banks. So, the future will be pure misery in this country as it will be increasing difficult to retain employment due to our lack of competitiveness. The only way Ireland can compete for a future worth living would be for the government to re privatize bank debt.


Advertisement