Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Bands who legitimately never had a bad album

  • 25-01-2016 09:56AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,373
    ✭✭✭


    Are there any bands out there where every album they released was rated well by critics, sold well and was generally regarded as being good by their fans?

    The 80s was a rough time for a lot of the great, Dylan and the Stones released some guff. The 90s were a hard time for Bowie with some of his less stellar stuff released.

    Only going with studio albums. Live albums, cover albums and best ofs don't really count in my opinion, and obviously no point in looking at bands that only had one album (the Avalanches, Minor Threat)

    The only onesI can think of off the top of my head is Rage Against theMachine (three albums, Evil Empire is probably the weakest, but still holdswell in its own right) and Arcade Fire (pretty much each release has been aserious hit)

    Any other bands you can think of?


Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
«134

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,605 Welsh Megaman
    ✭✭✭✭


    Joy Division


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 JohnFalstaff
    ✭✭✭


    The Smiths
    The Blue Nile


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,989 flasher0030
    ✭✭✭


    I'd say The Stone Roses, even though it's only 2 albums.

    Maybe Sigur Ros - but I've never listened to Von. So haven't the full picture. But they haven't made a bad album since.

    Nirvana??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,605 Welsh Megaman
    ✭✭✭✭


    Nine Inch Nails

    The American metal band Tool


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,088 OhHiMark
    ✭✭✭


    The National


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,877 riffmongous
    Mod ✭✭✭✭


    Judas priest! Although I haven't listened their recent stuff they've released a huge amount of albums with only one that 'divided opinion'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,860 caviardreams
    ✭✭✭


    Polly Harvey.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,987 Kerrigooney
    ✭✭✭


    Sparklehorse.

    The Smiths.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,797 sweetie
    ✭✭✭


    Wilco, Super Furry Animals, White stripes


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,584 Creamy Goodness
    ✭✭✭✭


    Muse




    :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,105 Akrasia
    ✭✭✭✭


    Are there any bands out there where every album they released was rated well by critics, sold well and was generally regarded as being good by their fans?

    The 80s was a rough time for a lot of the great, Dylan and the Stones released some guff. The 90s were a hard time for Bowie with some of his less stellar stuff released.

    Only going with studio albums. Live albums, cover albums and best ofs don't really count in my opinion, and obviously no point in looking at bands that only had one album (the Avalanches, Minor Threat)

    The only onesI can think of off the top of my head is Rage Against theMachine (three albums, Evil Empire is probably the weakest, but still holdswell in its own right) and Arcade Fire (pretty much each release has been aserious hit)

    Any other bands you can think of?

    Radiohead have released loads of albums in wildly differing styles of music and I don't think any of them are bad albums. Some people don't like Pablo Honey because it's so different from the later work but for what it was, a indy guitar sound it had some great tracks


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,141 Stealthfins
    ✭✭✭


    The Cure


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,028 ButtersSuki
    ✭✭✭✭


    Depeche Mode.

    Not everyone's cup of tea but throughout all the experimentation and evolution the core remains very special.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75,605 Welsh Megaman
    ✭✭✭✭


    Portishead


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,586 Zeek12
    ✭✭✭✭


    Talking Heads
    Steely Dan
    The Black Keys


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,489 loyatemu
    ✭✭✭✭


    Zeek12 wrote:
    Talking Heads

    Not a big fan of "Naked"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,051 Arghus
    ✭✭✭✭


    I'd say Ween.

    Heavy amount of personal bias on my part, they are my favourite band. But I like to think that them being so awesome has a lot to do with why I like them so much.

    In nine studio albums, I don't think I could legitimately call one "bad". Some are more special in my eyes than others, but they all have their time and place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,051 Arghus
    ✭✭✭✭


    I'd say Ween.

    Heavy amount of personal bias on my part, they are my favourite band. But I like to think that them being so awesome has a lot to do with why I like them so much.

    In nine studio albums, I don't think I could legitimately call one "bad". Some are more special in my eyes than others, but they all have their time and place.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 588 cometogether
    ✭✭✭


    Arctic Monkeys


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,269 Decuc500
    ✭✭✭


    Pearl Jam.

    25 years worth of albums and not one bad one amongst them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,184 Pighead
    ✭✭✭✭


    I think quite a few of these suggestions fall down on the 'sold well' part of the listed criteria in the opening post.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,538 jooksavage
    ✭✭✭


    The Stooges...

    Oh wait, I just remembered their last 2 albums.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,216 dinneenp
    ✭✭✭


    MBV, Red House Painters, Cocteau Twins, The Frank and Walters, LCD Soundsytem, Stereolab.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,359 PropJoe10
    ✭✭✭


    Soundgarden
    Led Zeppelin
    Pearl Jam


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,359 PropJoe10
    ✭✭✭


    Soundgarden
    Led Zeppelin
    Pearl Jam


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,438 endacl
    ✭✭✭✭


    I've been in several bands. Never released an album.

    I'd have to say, I've a remarkable track record in never releasing a bad album!

    :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,538 jooksavage
    ✭✭✭


    Arghus wrote: »
    I'd say Ween.

    Heavy amount of personal bias on my part, they are my favourite band. But I like to think that them being so awesome has a lot to do with why I like them so much.

    In nine studio albums, I don't think I could legitimately call one "bad". Some are more special in my eyes than others, but they all have their time and place.

    Nice! My wife used to despise Ween but she's even come around to GodWeenSatan now. I put it down to expoure therapy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,373 The_Captain
    ✭✭✭


    Pighead wrote: »
    I think quite a few of these suggestions fall down on the 'sold well' part of the listed criteria in the opening post.


    And the critical acclaim bit too, but I'm happy to let it run


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,051 Arghus
    ✭✭✭✭


    jooksavage wrote: »
    Nice! My wife used to despise Ween but she's even come around to GodWeenSatan now. I put it down to expoure therapy.

    In my experience they can work their charms on almost anyone, if given enough time.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,797 sweetie
    ✭✭✭


    Tindersticks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,586 Canadel
    ✭✭✭


    Arcade Fire (pretty much each release has been aserious hit)
    I agree (apart from disc 1 of Reflektor). Huge admirer of Arcade Fire. If they can deliver on their next album they will have eclipsed all other indie/rock bands, if they haven't done so already. History will remember them well either way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75 timmaii
    ✭✭


    Fugazi
    Pavement
    REM (some of the later ones maybe weren't as good but no bad albums)
    Vampire Weekend
    Sparklehorse

    Was going to say the Pixies but then I realised I haven't heard their new one and I suspect it's going to ruin my arguement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,489 loyatemu
    ✭✭✭✭


    REM (some of the later ones maybe weren't as good but no bad albums)

    None of their albums after "Up" are great, and "Around the Sun" is terrible.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 11,395 lordgoat
    Mod ✭✭✭✭


    Wilco
    Elliott Smith Up to From a Basement. I don't count after that.


    loyatemu wrote: »
    None of their albums after "Up" are great, and "Around the Sun" is terrible.

    It's absolute garbage and this is from someone who thinks Monster is easily their best album.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,359 PropJoe10
    ✭✭✭


    loyatemu wrote: »
    None of their albums after "Up" are great, and "Around the Sun" is terrible.

    I thought Collapse Into Now and Reveal were really good. Around The Sun is an absolute snoozefest though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 iomega
    ✭✭


    Pixies


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,347 Grayditch
    ✭✭✭✭


    Radiohead. Elbow. Tool. Deftones. At The Drive-In.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75 timmaii
    ✭✭


    PropJoe10 wrote: »
    I thought Collapse Into Now and Reveal were really good. Around The Sun is an absolute snoozefest though.

    I forgot about Around The Sun, that kills my REM arguement alright.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,538 jooksavage
    ✭✭✭


    I know John Fahey isn't a band but he's my pick. Some of his output in the 80s was patchy enough but he never made an album that I regret buying. His movement towards the avant garde late in his career was also admirable. Getting namechecked by the likes of Sonic Youth, he was being "rediscovered" in a similar way that he helped bring back the likes of Skip James et al. in the 1960s. Instead of falling back on his huge reportoire he starts recording a series of rather difficult albums. I don't LOVE all those records but they're quite interesting and really improve on repeated listens.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,467 Anesthetize
    ✭✭✭


    Grayditch wrote: »
    Radiohead
    Pablo Honey was fairly poor. The King of Limbs was average at best.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,359 PropJoe10
    ✭✭✭


    Grayditch wrote: »
    Radiohead. Elbow. Tool. Deftones. At The Drive-In.

    Tool is a great shout, although Undertow isn't my favourite.

    Alice In Chains have never done a bad album. The new stuff is stellar.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,383 S.M.B.
    ✭✭✭


    Grayditch wrote: »
    Radiohead. Elbow. Tool. Deftones. At The Drive-In.

    Could be new albums from all of these bands over the next 12 months too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,797 sweetie
    ✭✭✭


    Smiths, supergrass, go-betweens


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,347 Grayditch
    ✭✭✭✭


    Pablo Honey was fairly poor. The King of Limbs was average at best.

    I think only with revisionism is Pablo Honey a bad album. At the time, it was a good grungy British rock album. King Of Limbs wasn't great but it isn't "bad".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,580 Riesen_Meal
    ✭✭✭✭


    Grayditch wrote: »
    I think only with revisionism is Pablo Honey a bad album. At the time, it was a good grungy British rock album. King Of Limbs wasn't great but it isn't "bad".

    Pablo Honey is just dated really IMO...

    King of Limbs is amazing, but I've a 10inch picture disc with the newspaper and acid blotting paper, im biased... :)

    Queens Of The Stone Age haven't released a bad album IMO....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,821 cnocbui
    ✭✭✭✭


    The Beatles
    Curve
    Goldfrapp
    The XX
    Dead Can Dance


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,347 Grayditch
    ✭✭✭✭


    Fieldog wrote: »
    Pablo Honey is just dated really IMO...

    King of Limbs is amazing, but I've a 10inch picture disc with the newspaper and acid blotting paper, im biased... :)

    Queens Of The Stone Age haven't released a bad album IMO....

    I think I'll give TKOL a couple of spins again today.

    QOTSA is a good shout too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,373 The_Captain
    ✭✭✭


    The weak list:

    Pavement - Wowee Zowee
    Pixies - Trompe le Monde
    Radiohead - King of Limbs
    Nirvana - Bleach
    QOTSA - Era Vulgaris


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,857 Wanderer78
    ✭✭✭✭


    Pavement - Wowee Zowee Pixies - Trompe le Monde Radiohead - King of Limbs Nirvana - Bleach QOTSA - Era Vulgaris


    Bleach rocks!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,347 Grayditch
    ✭✭✭✭


    Is a bad album, not just one universally panned by critics and fans? We're getting into weak and weak by career comparison. Like a St. Anger or ... anything by Muse lately.


  • Advertisement

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
Advertisement