Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Dublin Bay South By-Election

1171819202123»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,492 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    athlone573 wrote: »
    Tis a bit of an echo chamber in here with the Bacik fans. The ones who think she's a bit uppity and just as much an embodiment of middle class privilege as the FG lad are staying out of it.

    Uppity? Really.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,744 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Who's finding it hard to see the difference between the one who was threatened with jail for providing abortion information at age 17 and was at the forefront of the abortion rights debate for 30 years and the one who worked for Creighton at Renua?

    The vote isn't about their history on abortion rights.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    You people simply cannot be for real.

    Not really. I know people have done the barrister road the hard way. Not from prominent political or legal families in Dublin without one tenth of the opportunities that Geoghegan would have had at is fingertips via the social capital of his parents (not to mention his wider family).

    Let's all pretend that his life path is a result of his shining brilliance and intelligence and nothing to do his family's station.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,118 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    The vote isn't about their history on abortion rights.

    No but that is one example of their difference and shows your claim up as nonsense.

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    I see John Bruton came out to bat for James Geoghegan in the Irish Times letters pages. John bristles at the fact that Una Mullaly brought up he interned in the EU embassy in Washington while Bruton was Ambassador and said he was a great little operator altogether. If someone in James' family/circle didn't pick up the phone or write an email to John to get James his sweetheart internship while he was in college I'll eat a boiled shoe.

    This is the point. This is how privilege replicates itself. Never mind there are thousands of competent bright Irish students that would thrive should they get an opportunity like that via a competitive process. And that many wouldn't have the means to support themselves without patronage or wealthy parents. While James the scion of a legal and political dynasty gets shuffled in there no bother to make his CV look tip-top.

    Fine Gael just don't get it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,234 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Yurt! wrote: »
    I see John Bruton came out to bat for James Geoghegan in the Irish Times letters pages. John bristles at the fact that Una Mullaly brought up he interned in the EU embassy in Washington while Bruton was Ambassador and said he was a great little operator altogether. If someone in James' family/circle didn't pick up the phone or write an email to John to get James his sweetheart internship while he was in college I'll eat a boiled shoe.

    This is the point. This is how privilege replicates itself. Never mind there are thousands of competent bright Irish students that would thrive should they get an opportunity like that via a competitive process. And that many wouldn't have the means to support themselves without patronage or wealthy parents. While James the scion of a legal and political dynasty gets shuffled in there no bother to make his CV look tip-top.

    Fine Gael just don't get it.

    So your entire rant about him is made up on an assumption?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,959 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Well, it is all over now - Ivana Bacik won.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,831 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    A much-needed victory for Labour. Interesting the FG vote held up while FF & Green tanked.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,959 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    That may be the FF Green voters voted for IB. The vote was very low, so enthusiasm helped. I had a posse of FG outriders looking to shoo us to the polls, but we had already been. FG and SF got their vote out.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,029 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    he is councillor in the area, that was his profile. I don't think you can be parachuted in over somebody who didn't put themselves forward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,903 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Well, I was wrong saying she wasn't the right candidate for Labour. Think that was before O'Connell was definitely out but it might not have been!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭Blut2


    I have to hold my hands up and say I was also completely wrong with my initial doubts about Bacik's electability. She did very well to be fair to her.

    FG's vote held up reasonably well so they can probably just blame the result on Geoghegan being a pretty bad candidate. O'Connell probably would have taken the seat for them.

    FF on the other hand...their worst election result in their history I believe. It should really serve as a huge warning sign to them that they face electoral obliteration in the next election unless they manage to achieve some very substantial things on housing and health.



  • Administrators Posts: 54,184 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    SF must be disappointed as well, I think their vote share went down and they are the main opposition party?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,959 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Particularly since they made a huge effort to get their vote out, as did FG. The FG vote help up, but not so much for the SF vote.

    I saw no SF or FF presence in my area, but plenty of FG, Green and Labour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The SF vote actually held up better than the FG vote, according to the figures. Vote difference between the 2020 General election and the DBS by-election result:

    LAB +22.4%

    SF -0.3%

    SD -1.4%

    FG -1.5%

    FF -9%

    Grn -14.5%

    We'd need more granular statistics to know the breakdown details for certain, but I'd imagine the historically very low working class by-election turnout, and Boylan's lack of local constituency connections/work, was cancelled out by an increased anti-government vote - which combined left them pretty much at a standstill.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,831 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    I've no doubt that the FG and SF vote both involved a significant amount of churn, but given the difficulty in knowing for sure I tend to reach for Occam's Razor.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,301 ✭✭✭✭jm08


    I'm surprised that SF did as well as they did. Last Gen. Election it was the first time for SF to win a seat in this constituency and a lot of that has to do that Chris Andrews is of the political Andrews family dynasty of Fianna Fail and would have a fairly high and well respected profile in the Constituency.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭zimmermania


    BY-ELECTIONS can be difficult to predict,occasionally if one candidate appears to be head and shoulders above all others he/she gets a vote in multiples of what their party is getting in the polls.

    Labour could not have expected to head the poll in any circumstances,but because Bacik was identified as far and away the best candidate she headed the poll.

    Michael D did the same or the same reasons and Jan O'Sullivan also did the same in 1998 for Labour in a by-election in Limerick when against all odds she headed the poll and won the seat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,903 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The thing is that having a locally good candidate is the only way a party on say under 10% nationally can ever expect to get a seat at all. That got Labour 20 seats off 10.1% in 2007 - few if any of them could be seen as having been lifted in to place by a party had been on a fairly static vote share for a decade.

    Whereas once a party is getting towards a polling figure that would be a five seat quota (16-17%) and beyond its much more likely that a candidate can just get lucky.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭zimmermania


    There is a bit more to her election than that,you felt she was the wrong candidate in the first place and now you attribute her success to luck!

    It is obvious she was perceived as the best candidate by so many

    voters despite the Labour party's poor position in the polls.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,903 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    You didn't understand my post if you think I said she got lucky.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,726 ✭✭✭zimmermania


    Maybe you could explain what you your post meant.



Advertisement